Health Plans Don’t Fund Good Ideas. They Fund What They Can’t Ignore.
What Health Tech Vendors Miss About Health Plan Priorities
Health plans don’t fund good ideas. They fund what they can’t afford to ignore.
That’s the line vendors cross…or don’t.
With internal teams stretched thin and budgets under review, health plans are making faster decisions about what gets through. And too many vendors are mistaking early interest for real momentum.
The result? Six months chasing a deal that was never urgent enough to close.
The mistake isn’t the solution. It’s the positioning.
You were seen as helpful. But not critical.
This piece breaks down how that happens and what to change before the next deal quietly slips away.
We’ll cover:
Why health plans filter by pressure over potential
How internal tradeoffs derail even well-aligned solutions
What the best vendors do to attach to real momentum
And how to qualify for priority before the deal goes dark
1. Pressure, Not Potential, Drives Health Plan Decisions
By the time your team is chasing follow-ups, the deal’s probably already lost.
Not to a competitor, but to something louder.
Inside a plan, every team is triaging. Quality, clinical, member experience—they’re buried in internal fires. And no matter how strong your solution is, it’s getting stacked up against those fires. Not evaluated in isolation.
That’s where most vendors get blindsided.
You see opportunity: better outcomes, higher engagement, stronger lift.
They see work: procurement, integration, new reporting, and another thing to justify.
And when internal bandwidth is limited, even the best ideas feel like threats to stability.
If your solution doesn’t connect to something already under review or getting heat, it’s not urgent. It’s optional.
Here’s what actually gets prioritized:
“We missed one cutpoint in medication adherence last year—what’s the plan to recover?”
“Our access score dropped in CAHPS, and Medicare Ops is asking for immediate fixes.”
“Compliance flagged elevated RADV risk—we need a way to tighten our submission accuracy.”
“An exec leader’s KPIs are tied to improving DSNP retention. This supports that push.”
If you’re not plugged into one of those internal drivers, you’re not on the list.
If they’re not under pressure to solve the problem you solve, they’re not solving it this quarter.
And even if they are? You can still lose the deal if your pitch makes them nervous.
(Recommended Reading: Health Plans Don’t Buy Disruption for more on how buyer anxiety quietly kills deals.)
2. Internal Tradeoffs Derail Good Solutions
Inside a health plan, no one circulates a ranked list of priorities.
However, there is a hierarchy, and if your solution isn’t tied to something already tracked, questioned, or promised upstream, you won’t be in the top five.
Strong solutions stall out not because they lack merit, but because they don’t anchor to something already moving.
It might look like this:
Your rollout requires modest IT support, but that team has just been pulled into building FHIR APIs for a state data exchange pilot.
The budget lives in Population Health, but they weren’t in the room, and now they're questioning why it should come from their line item.
You’ve got traction with Quality, but Clinical Ops just lost a director and nothing’s moving until a replacement is in place (and even then, they may want to revisit everything).
No one’s rejecting you. They just can’t (or won’t) restructure around you.
And they won’t say that outright. Inside a plan, it’s easier to let something fade than explain why it’s been deprioritized.
This is what gets missed when CEOs see slow motion and assume the pitch fell flat.
Often, nothing went wrong. You just didn’t displace something with more weight.
Prioritization isn’t always formal. But it’s very real.
It shows up in who has leadership backing, a protected budget, a favorable roadmap placement, or the political fluency to get things approved.
If your solution doesn’t fit into one of those lanes, it won’t move, regardless of how promising it looked initially.
This is where good solutions die: not from rejection, but from inertia.
And if you’re not mapping to momentum, you will lose to something that is.
3. Great Vendors Attach to What’s Already Moving
Plans rarely reshuffle priorities mid-cycle.
Too many projects are already funded, have been promised upstream, or are politically untouchable.
That’s why smart vendors don’t ask the plan to make room.
They figure out what’s already moving—and align to it.
They don’t show up pitching a better idea. They show up as the better way to deliver on something the plan’s already under pressure to execute.
I’ve seen vendors accelerate deals just by repositioning around:
A Care Management workstream that’s already funded but understaffed and needs a vendor to hit a critical timeline or milestone
A known gap in their risk adjustment recapture strategy, especially if finance or compliance flagged exposure in recent reviews
A board-flagged issue (like grievances, ED follow-up, or care access) that leadership’s already asking about
The message isn’t “here’s what we do.”
It’s “you’re already working on this—here’s how we make that more successful, without spinning up something net-new.”
That’s the difference. They don’t pitch abstract value.
They align to priorities that are already funded, visible, and politically defensible.
4. Winning Is About Deal Discipline
But aligning to urgency only matters if you can spot it and confirm it’s actionable.
The issue usually isn’t how you’re positioning the product.
It’s what you’re failing to qualify.
Too many teams walk out of a good call thinking, “We’re in!”
But they never ask what the solution is competing with.
They don’t map where it fits in the buyer’s existing roadmap.
They don’t clarify who owns the budget or whether it has executive visibility.
This isn’t a story problem. It’s a pipeline discipline problem.
The vendors who win don’t just tell a sharper story.
They pressure-test the opportunity:
What else could derail or deprioritize this?
What timeline is the buyer already managing to?
Who else needs to say yes, and do they know this convo exists?
If those answers aren’t clear, the deal isn’t qualified.
It’s just sitting there, waiting to be displaced.
Final Thought
A lot of vendor teams walk into deals with real traction, then watch them stall.
Not because the buyer lost interest, but because something else within the plan got prioritized first.
That’s the shift this article is aiming for:
From pitching based on standalone value to managing the deal based on what’s already getting attention, resources, and pressure internally.
The vendors who close don’t just tell a better story.
They align to existing goals.
They position their solution as a credible way to execute on something the plan is already accountable for: whether that’s a quality metric, a compliance mandate, or a financial outcome.
If your solution fits that profile, the real question is whether you've positioned it clearly, in the terms and timelines your buyer is already navigating.
If the plan is already on the hook for it, and you can help them deliver it, you’re not a vendor anymore. You’re the solution.
Not sure what to read next?
Upward Growth has organized the most valuable content into a simple, searchable guide, grouped by the challenges health tech leaders are actively trying to solve.
Whether you’re refining your positioning, running better sales meetings, or scaling a repeatable growth motion, you’ll find focused recommendations by topic.
→ Explore the Upward Growth Starter Guide
📣 Support this work
This newsletter runs on real-world insight and real conversations. If it’s helping you pitch, position, or close smarter, you can now support the work.
→ Become a supporter